↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates
Published in
Water Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuria Montpart, Laura Rago, Juan A. Baeza, Albert Guisasola

Abstract

The use of synthetic wastewater containing carbon sources of different complexity (glycerol, milk and starch) was evaluated in single chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) for hydrogen production. The growth of an anodic syntrophic consortium between fermentative and anode respiring bacteria was operationally enhanced and increased the opportunities of these complex substrates to be treated with this technology. During inoculation, current intensities achieved in single chamber microbial fuel cells were 50, 62.5, and 9 A m(-3) for glycerol, milk and starch respectively. Both current intensities and coulombic efficiencies were higher than other values reported in previous works. The simultaneous degradation of the three complex substrates favored power production and COD removal. After three months in MEC operation, hydrogen production was only sustained with milk as a single substrate and with the simultaneous degradation of the three substrates. The later had the best results in terms of current intensity (150 A m(-3)), hydrogen production (0.94 m(3) m(-3) d(-1)) and cathodic gas recovery (91%) at an applied voltage of 0.8 V. Glycerol and starch as substrates in MEC could not avoid the complete proliferation of hydrogen scavengers, even under low hydrogen retention time conditions induced by continuous nitrogen sparging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 24%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 52 22%
Engineering 44 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Chemical Engineering 19 8%
Chemistry 12 5%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 63 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,811,813
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#360
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,112
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#5
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.