You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption of non–cow’s milk beverages and serum vitamin D levels in early childhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.140555 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grace J Lee, Catherine S Birken, Patricia C Parkin, Gerald Lebovic, Yang Chen, Mary R L'Abbé, Jonathon L Maguire |
| Abstract |
Vitamin D fortification of non-cow's milk beverages is voluntary in North America. The effect of consuming non-cow's milk beverages on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in children is unclear. We studied the association between non-cow's milk consumption and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in healthy preschool-aged children. We also explored whether cow's milk consumption modified this association and analyzed the association between daily non-cow's milk and cow's milk consumption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Maldives | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 32% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#178,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#325
of 9,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,611
of 276,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.