| Title |
Humerale und glenoidale Knochendefekte in der Schulterendoprothetik
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-017-3484-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Gohlke, B. Werner |
| Abstract |
The treatment of bone defects in primary shoulder arthroplasty has evolved due to more detailed diagnostic tools, 3D planning and expanded indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid bone defects combined with chronic posterior subluxation of the humeral head are gradually being treated by glenoid reconstruction and reverse implants even if the rotator cuff is still intact. The treatment of advanced bone loss due to glenoid loosening has been facilitated by bone augmentation using a cementless fixation as proposed by Norris. Precise pre-operative planning using reformatted computed tomography (CT) and dedicated instruments is recommended in primary and revision arthroplasty. Revision rates and complications are high for revision surgery in extended glenoid and humeral bone loss. Functional results are limited in these cases, particularly after multiple operations and damage of the soft tissue envelope. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 73% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,069
of 338,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.