You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Applying Alternate IPCC Climate Scenarios to Marine Reserve Design for Range Changing Species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12147 |
| Authors |
Azusa Makino, Carissa J. Klein, Hugh P. Possingham, Hiroya Yamano, Yumiko Yara, Toshinori Ariga, Keisuke Matsuhasi, Maria Beger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#908
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,225
of 270,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.