↓ Skip to main content

Urban wastewater effluent increases antibiotic resistance gene concentrations in a receiving northern European river

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban wastewater effluent increases antibiotic resistance gene concentrations in a receiving northern European river
Published in
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/etc.2784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn Berglund, Jerker Fick, Per‐Eric Lindgren

Abstract

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are an emerging global problem that threatens to undermine important advances in modern medicine. The environment is likely to play an important role in the dissemination of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) among both environmental and pathogenic bacteria. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) accumulate both chemical and biological waste from the surrounding urban milieu and have therefore been viewed as potential hotspots for dissemination and development of antibiotic resistance. To assess the effect of wastewater effluent on a river that flows through a Swedish city, sediment and water samples were collected from Stångån River, both upstream and downstream of an adjacent WWTP over 3 mo. Seven ARGs and the integrase gene on class 1 integrons were quantified in the collected sediment using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to assess the abundance of 10 different antibiotics in the water phase of the samples. The results showed an increase in ARGs and integrons downstream of the WWTP. The measured concentrations of antibiotics were low in the water samples from the Stångån River, suggesting that selection for ARGs did not occur in the surface water. Instead, the downstream increase in ARGs is likely to be attributable to accumulation of genes present in the treated effluent discharged from the WWTP. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:192-196. © 2014 SETAC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Engineering 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,979,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#3,756
of 5,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,727
of 371,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.