| Title |
How caterpillars avoid overheating: behavioral and phenotypic plasticity of pipevine swallowtail larvae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-005-0229-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris C. Nice, James A. Fordyce |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Mauritania | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 28% |
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,058
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,991
of 71,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.