| Title |
Are Inner Context Factors Related to Implementation Outcomes in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Youth Anxiety?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-013-0529-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rinad S. Beidas, Julie Edmunds, Matthew Ditty, Jessica Watkins, Lucia Walsh, Steven Marcus, Philip Kendall |
| Abstract |
Among the challenges facing the mental health field are the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices. The present study investigated the relationships between inner context variables (i.e., adopter characteristics and individual perceptions of intra-organizational factors) and two implementation outcomes-independently rated therapist fidelity on a performance-based role-play (i.e., adherence and skill) and self-reported penetration of cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety following training. A significant relationship was found between inner context variables and fidelity. Specifically, adopter characteristics were associated with adherence and skill; individual perceptions of intra-organizational factors were associated with adherence. Inner context variables were not associated with penetration. Future directions are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 49% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,950,527
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#630
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,790
of 230,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.