↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of α-synuclein and GBA1 in Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 2,229)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Molecular mechanisms of α-synuclein and GBA1 in Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00441-017-2704-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iva Stojkovska, Dimitri Krainc, Joseph R. Mazzulli

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder characterized pathologically by the presence of Lewy bodies comprised of insoluble alpha (α)-synuclein. Pathological, clinical and genetic studies demonstrate that mutations in the GBA1 gene, which encodes the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase) that is deficient in Gaucher's disease, are important risk factors for the development of PD. The molecular mechanism for the association between these two diseases is not completely understood. We discuss several possible mechanisms that may lead to GBA1-related neuronal death and α-synuclein accumulation including disruptions in lipid metabolism, protein trafficking and impaired protein quality control mechanisms. Elucidating the mechanism between GCase and α-synuclein may provide insight into potential therapeutic pathways for PD and related synucleinopathies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 44 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 22%
Neuroscience 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,057,017
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#33
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,743
of 334,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.