↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis use in early psychosis is associated with reduced glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Cannabis use in early psychosis is associated with reduced glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex
Published in
Psychopharmacology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00213-017-4745-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Rigucci, Lijing Xin, Paul Klauser, Philipp S. Baumann, Luis Alameda, Martine Cleusix, Raoul Jenni, Carina Ferrari, Maurizio Pompili, Rolf Gruetter, Kim Q. Do, Philippe Conus

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that cannabis may disrupt glutamate (Glu) signaling depressing Glu tone in frequent users. Current evidence have also consistently reported lower Glu-levels in various brain regions, particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of chronic schizophrenia patients, while findings in early psychosis (EP) are not conclusive. Since cannabis may alter Glu synaptic plasticity and its use is a known risk factor for psychosis, studies focusing on Glu signaling in EP with or without a concomitant cannabis-usage seem crucial. We investigate the effect of cannabis use on prefrontal Glu-levels in EP users vs. both EP non-users and healthy controls (HC). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure [GlumPFC] of 35 EP subjects (18 of whom were cannabis users) and 33 HC. For correlative analysis, neuropsychological performances were scored by the MATRICS-consensus cognitive battery. [GlumPFC] was lower in EP users comparing to both HC and EP non-users (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively), while no differences were observed between EP non-users and HC. A greater [GlumPFC]-decline with age was observed in EP users (r = -.46; p = 0.04), but not in EP non-users or HC. Among neuropsychological outcomes, working memory was the only domain that differentiates patients depending on their cannabis use, with users having poorer performances. Cannabis use is associated with reduced prefrontal [GlumPFC] and with a stronger Glu-levels decline with age. Glutamatergic abnormalities might influence the cognitive impairment observed in users and have some relevance for the progression of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 41 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 49 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,747,755
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,207
of 5,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,624
of 334,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#19
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.