You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risks and drivers of wild bird feeding in urban areas of New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.038 |
| Authors |
Josie A. Galbraith, Jacqueline R. Beggs, Darryl N. Jones, Ellery J. McNaughton, Cheryl R. Krull, Margaret C. Stanley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 10 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,095,030
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#958
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,899
of 375,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.