↓ Skip to main content

Manufacturing of graded titanium scaffolds using a novel space holder technique

Overview of attention for article published in Bioactive Materials, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manufacturing of graded titanium scaffolds using a novel space holder technique
Published in
Bioactive Materials, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunhui Chen, Damon Kent, Michael Bermingham, Ali Dehghan-Manshadi, Gui Wang, Cuie Wen, Matthew Dargusch

Abstract

To optimize both the mechanical and biological properties of titanium for biomedical implants, a highly flexible powder metallurgy approach is proposed to generate porous scaffolds with graded porosities and pore sizes. Sugar pellets acting as space holders were compacted with titanium powder and then removed by dissolution in water before sintering. The morphology, pore structure, porosity and pore interconnectivity were observed by optical microscopy and SEM. The results show that the porous titanium has porosity levels and pore size gradients consistent with their design with gradual and smooth transitions at the interfaces between regions of differing porosities and/or pore sizes. Meanwhile, the porous titanium has high interconnectivity between pores and highly spherical pore shapes. In this article we show that this powder metallurgy processing technique, employing the novel sugar pellets as space-holders, can generate porous titanium foams with well-controlled graded porosities and pore sizes. This method has excellent potential for producing porous titanium structures for hard tissue engineering applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 28%
Materials Science 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Bioactive Materials
#1,088
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,062
of 325,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioactive Materials
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.