You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New estimates and a decomposition of provincial productivity change in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
China Economic Review (13506390), September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.chieco.2014.05.016 |
Authors |
James Laurenceson, Christopher O'Donnell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 48% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 45% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from China Economic Review (13506390)
#100
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,361
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Economic Review (13506390)
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.