↓ Skip to main content

Association between intravenous chloride load during resuscitation and in-hospital mortality among patients with SIRS

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Association between intravenous chloride load during resuscitation and in-hospital mortality among patients with SIRS
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3505-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Shaw, Karthik Raghunathan, Fred W. Peyerl, Sibyl H. Munson, Scott M. Paluszkiewicz, Carol R. Schermer

Abstract

Recent data suggest that both elevated serum chloride levels and volume overload may be harmful during fluid resuscitation. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the intravenous chloride load and in-hospital mortality among patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), with and without adjustment for the crystalloid volume administered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 140 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 17%
Student > Postgraduate 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 68%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,088,813
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,658
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,966
of 271,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.