Title |
Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2372-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandrine Essouri, Philippe Durand, Laurent Chevret, Laurent Balu, Denis Devictor, Brigitte Fauroux, Pierre Tissières |
Abstract |
To determine the optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in infants with severe hypercapnic viral bronchiolitis as assessed by the maximal unloading of the respiratory muscles and improvement of breathing pattern and gas exchange. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 19% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,308,698
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,997
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,326
of 136,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.