↓ Skip to main content

Early integration of palliative cancer care: patients’ and caregivers’ challenges, treatment preferences, and knowledge of illness and treatment throughout the cancer trajectory

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Early integration of palliative cancer care: patients’ and caregivers’ challenges, treatment preferences, and knowledge of illness and treatment throughout the cancer trajectory
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-3911-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Preisler, Silke Heuse, Manuel Riemer, Friederike Kendel, Anne Letsch

Abstract

Early integration of palliative care (EIPC) into oncology is beneficial for cancer patients and their caregivers. Best practice models of EIPC throughout the course of cancer treatment aim to support patients and caregivers in meeting their individual needs. So far, we know little about whether EIPC offers should be phase-specific or patient-centered. This study investigated patients' and caregivers' needs considering individual challenges, treatment preferences, and knowledge over the cancer trajectory. Semi-structured qualitative interviews and pre-interview questionnaires were conducted with 11 cancer patients and 9 caregivers. A modified grounded theory approach was used to analyze the interview data applying thematic analysis and reflective principles by using MAXQDA. Our data showed no clearly distinct pattern of illness-phase-specific needs of patients and caregivers. Support needs were dependent on the significance and interpretation of events by patients and caregivers. Mastering challenges was highly individual and influenced by personal and contextual factors. Our results showed that subjective theories of illness significantly influenced experience, information requirements, treatment preferences, and the feeling of patients and caregivers "to be in good hands." The physician-patient relationship was of central relevance and has a major gatekeeper function for EIPC. Access to the medical care system, resources, and information appeared to be based on chance. For optimal EIPC, it is necessary to improve structural conditions such as more structured information about resources and procedures. Subjective theories of illness need to be continuously considered by practitioners in order to recognize the individual need for support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Psychology 14 14%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,728,888
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,603
of 4,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,878
of 326,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#48
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.