↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of corrosion behavior in artificial saliva of 2507 and 2205 duplex stainless steel for orthodontic wires before and after heat treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of corrosion behavior in artificial saliva of 2507 and 2205 duplex stainless steel for orthodontic wires before and after heat treatment
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10856-017-5997-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Sabea Hammood, Ahmed Faraj Noor, Mohammed Talib Alkhafagy

Abstract

The present study investigates comparison between corrosion behavior of 2507 and 2205 DSS in artificial saliva for orthodontic wires. The heat treatment is necessary for 2507 and 2205 duplex stainless steel to remove or dissolve intermetallic phases, removed segregation and to relieve any residual thermal stress in DSS which may be formed during production processes. The corrosion behavior of a 2507 and 2205 DSS in artificial saliva was studied by SEM, HV test and potentiodynamic measurements. The results indicate that the corrosion resistance mainly depends on presence of secondary phases (sigma phase) and ferrite /austenite ratio, it's revealed that the corrosion resistance of 2507 DSS higher than 2205 DSS in artificial saliva at 37 °C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,865,570
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#296
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,297
of 326,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them