| Title |
The assessment of transpulmonary pressure in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3415-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Chiumello, Massimo Cressoni, Andrea Colombo, Giovanni Babini, Matteo Brioni, Francesco Crimella, Stefan Lundin, Ola Stenqvist, Luciano Gattinoni |
| Abstract |
The optimal method for estimating transpulmonary pressure (i.e. the fraction of the airway pressure transmitted to the lung) has not yet been established. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 27% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 70% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,740,179
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,932
of 5,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,309
of 232,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.