| Title |
Cultivation with deliberation: cereals and their growing conditions in prehistory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00334-017-0609-z |
| Authors |
Dagmar Dreslerová, Petr Kočár, Tomáš Chuman, Adéla Pokorná |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,203,602
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#129
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,533
of 310,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.