↓ Skip to main content

Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
827 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
951 Mendeley
Title
Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review
Published in
Natural Hazards, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2
Authors

Michel Jaboyedoff, Thierry Oppikofer, Antonio Abellán, Marc-Henri Derron, Alex Loye, Richard Metzger, Andrea Pedrazzini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 951 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 925 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 199 21%
Student > Master 160 17%
Researcher 105 11%
Student > Bachelor 86 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 5%
Other 129 14%
Unknown 220 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 321 34%
Engineering 195 21%
Environmental Science 97 10%
Computer Science 23 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Other 49 5%
Unknown 251 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#911
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,207
of 113,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.