↓ Skip to main content

Caregiver Burden Varies by Sensory Subtypes and Sensory Dimension Scores of Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Caregiver Burden Varies by Sensory Subtypes and Sensory Dimension Scores of Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3348-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brittany N. Hand, Alison E. Lane, Paul De Boeck, D. Michele Basso, Deborah S. Nichols-Larsen, Amy R. Darragh

Abstract

Understanding characteristics associated with burden in caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is critical due to negative health consequences. We explored the association between child sensory subtype, sensory dimension scores, and caregiver burden. A national survey of caregivers of children with ASD aged 5-13 years was conducted (n = 367). The relationship between variables of interest and indicators of caregiver burden, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and caregiver strain, was examined with canonical correlation analyses. Caregiver strain was, but caregiver HRQOL was not, significantly associated with child sensory subtype and sensory dimension scores. Caregiver age, child age, and household income were also associated with caregiver strain. Potential explanatory mechanisms for these findings, derived from published qualitative studies, are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 52 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Psychology 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 56 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,639,633
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,988
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,868
of 339,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#79
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.