↓ Skip to main content

A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG
Published in
Brain Topography, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10548-017-0603-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

René J. Huster, Liisa Raud

Abstract

Over the last years we saw a steady increase in the relevance of big neuroscience data sets, and with it grew the need for analysis tools capable of handling such large data sets while simultaneously extracting properties of brain activity that generalize across subjects. For functional magnetic resonance imaging, multi-subject or group-level independent component analysis provided a data-driven approach to extract intrinsic functional networks, such as the default mode network. Meanwhile, this methodological framework has been adapted for the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) data. Here, we provide an overview of the currently available approaches for multi-subject data decomposition as applied to EEG, and highlight the characteristics of EEG that warrant special consideration. We further illustrate the importance of matching one's choice of method to the data characteristics at hand by guiding the reader through a set of simulations. In sum, algorithms for group-level decomposition of EEG provide an innovative and powerful tool to study the richness of functional brain networks in multi-subject EEG data sets.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 19%
Psychology 14 18%
Engineering 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 15 19%