↓ Skip to main content

Fail-safe and safe-to-fail adaptation: decision-making for urban flooding under climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Fail-safe and safe-to-fail adaptation: decision-making for urban flooding under climate change
Published in
Climatic Change, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2090-1
Authors

Yeowon Kim, Daniel A. Eisenberg, Emily N. Bondank, Mikhail V. Chester, Giuseppe Mascaro, B. Shane Underwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 23%
Student > Master 36 15%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 59 25%
Environmental Science 38 16%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Design 4 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 83 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,100,106
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,295
of 6,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,413
of 340,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.