| Title |
Blood flow restriction in the upper and lower limbs is predicted by limb circumference and systolic blood pressure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3030-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy P. Loenneke, Kirsten M. Allen, J. Grant Mouser, Robert S. Thiebaud, Daeyeol Kim, Takashi Abe, Michael G. Bemben |
| Abstract |
To determine what factors should be accounted for when setting the blood flow restriction (BFR) cuff pressure for the upper and lower body. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 47% |
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 83 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 78 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,240,390
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#976
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,168
of 273,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.