Title |
Lessons on Evolution from the Study of Edaphic Specialization
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Botanical Review, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12229-017-9193-2 |
Authors |
Nishanta Rajakaruna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,417,759
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#59
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,917
of 333,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.