↓ Skip to main content

The Economic Inefficiency of Secrecy: Pension Fund Investors’ Corporate Transparency Concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Economic Inefficiency of Secrecy: Pension Fund Investors’ Corporate Transparency Concerns
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-3968-9
Authors

Tessa Hebb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Lecturer 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 35 41%
Social Sciences 16 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 14%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,192
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,992
of 155,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.