↓ Skip to main content

Checking Cache-Coherence Protocols with TLA+

Overview of attention for article published in Formal Methods in System Design, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Checking Cache-Coherence Protocols with TLA+
Published in
Formal Methods in System Design, March 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022969405325
Authors

Rajeev Joshi, Leslie Lamport, John Matthews, Serdar Tasiran, Mark Tuttle, Yuan Yu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 8%
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Austria 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 81%
Engineering 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2011.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Formal Methods in System Design
#6
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,180
of 49,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Formal Methods in System Design
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them