↓ Skip to main content

Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,612)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
223 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
10 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1223 Mendeley
Title
Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review
Published in
Environmental Health, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12940-017-0315-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Mie, Helle Raun Andersen, Stefan Gunnarsson, Johannes Kahl, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Ewa Rembiałkowska, Gianluca Quaglio, Philippe Grandjean

Abstract

This review summarises existing evidence on the impact of organic food on human health. It compares organic vs. conventional food production with respect to parameters important to human health and discusses the potential impact of organic management practices with an emphasis on EU conditions. Organic food consumption may reduce the risk of allergic disease and of overweight and obesity, but the evidence is not conclusive due to likely residual confounding, as consumers of organic food tend to have healthier lifestyles overall. However, animal experiments suggest that identically composed feed from organic or conventional production impacts in different ways on growth and development. In organic agriculture, the use of pesticides is restricted, while residues in conventional fruits and vegetables constitute the main source of human pesticide exposures. Epidemiological studies have reported adverse effects of certain pesticides on children's cognitive development at current levels of exposure, but these data have so far not been applied in formal risk assessments of individual pesticides. Differences in the composition between organic and conventional crops are limited, such as a modestly higher content of phenolic compounds in organic fruit and vegetables, and likely also a lower content of cadmium in organic cereal crops. Organic dairy products, and perhaps also meats, have a higher content of omega-3 fatty acids compared to conventional products. However, these differences are likely of marginal nutritional significance. Of greater concern is the prevalent use of antibiotics in conventional animal production as a key driver of antibiotic resistance in society; antibiotic use is less intensive in organic production. Overall, this review emphasises several documented and likely human health benefits associated with organic food production, and application of such production methods is likely to be beneficial within conventional agriculture, e.g., in integrated pest management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 225 18%
Student > Master 161 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 8%
Researcher 92 8%
Other 52 4%
Other 178 15%
Unknown 418 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 123 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 92 8%
Environmental Science 64 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 4%
Other 274 22%
Unknown 461 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 433. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#66,603
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#33
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,398
of 341,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.