↓ Skip to main content

LES-based Study of the Roughness Effects on the Wake of a Circular Cylinder from Subcritical to Transcritical Reynolds Numbers

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Scientific Research, Section B, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
LES-based Study of the Roughness Effects on the Wake of a Circular Cylinder from Subcritical to Transcritical Reynolds Numbers
Published in
Applied Scientific Research, Section B, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10494-017-9866-2
Authors

Ivette Rodriguez, Oriol Lehmkuhl, Ugo Piomelli, Jorge Chiva, Ricard Borrell, Assensi Oliva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 54%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#128
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,006
of 339,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.