| Title |
Cytogenetic characterization of an N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine-induced mouse papillary urothelial carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-013-0820-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Regina Arantes-Rodrigues, Rosário Pinto-Leite, Rui Gil da Costa, Aura Colaço, Carlos Lopes, Paula Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,058
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,251
of 193,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.