↓ Skip to main content

Early Report on the Effectiveness of a Recovery Model Oriented Therapeutic Community for Individuals with Complex and Persistent Recovery Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric Quarterly, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Early Report on the Effectiveness of a Recovery Model Oriented Therapeutic Community for Individuals with Complex and Persistent Recovery Challenges
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11126-014-9292-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Young, Lisa Schactman, Matt Snyder

Abstract

This study summarizes the results of a 10 year longitudinal study of individual recovery progress within a residential program based upon therapeutic community principles and a Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model that emerged from a grounded theory analysis of real life recovery experiences (Young and Ensing, Psychiatr Rehab J 22:219-231, 1999). The four primary hypotheses of the study predicted significant and moderately sized effect sizes on a holistic set of measures, corresponding to the Enhanced Recovery Model. Results indicate support for all hypotheses; statistically significant and moderate to large effects were found in all domain measures for the participants, most of whom had multiple unsuccessful previous treatment attempts. These results indicate that this theoretical structure and residential model is effective in supporting recovery for individuals with complex and persistent challenges across the broad range of recovery domains. Conceptually, this also adds quantitative support for the Seven Domains Enhanced Recovery Model, complementing previous qualitative studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Philosophy 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,308,698
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#416
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,973
of 220,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.