↓ Skip to main content

Experience with intravenous ribavirin in the treatment of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Antiviral Research, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience with intravenous ribavirin in the treatment of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Korea
Published in
Antiviral Research, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janice M. Rusnak, William R. Byrne, Kyung N. Chung, Paul H. Gibbs, Theodore T. Kim, Ellen F. Boudreau, Thomas Cosgriff, Philip Pittman, Katie Y. Kim, Marianne S. Erlichman, David F. Rezvani, John W. Huggins

Abstract

Results of a clinical study using intravenous (IV) ribavirin for treating Department of Defense personnel with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) acquired in Korea from 1987 to 2005 were reviewed to determine the clinical course of HFRS treated with IV ribavirin. A total of 38 individuals enrolled in the study had subsequent serological confirmation of HFRS. Four of the 38 individuals received three or fewer doses of ribavirin and were excluded from treatment analysis. Of the remaining 34 individuals, oliguria was present in one individual at treatment initiation; none of the remaining 33 subjects developed oliguria or required dialysis. The mean peak serum creatinine was 3.46 mg/dl and occurred on day 2 of ribavirin therapy. Both the peak serum creatinine and the onset of polyuria occurred on mean day 6.8 of illness. Reversible hemolytic anemia was the main adverse event of ribavirin, with a >or=25% decrease in hematocrit observed in 26/34 (76.5%) individuals. While inability to adjust for all baseline variables prevents comparison to historical cohorts in Korea where oliguria has been reported in 39-69% cases and dialysis required in approximately 40% HFRS cases caused by Hantaan virus, the occurrence of 3% oliguria and 0% dialysis requirement in the treatment cohort is supportive of a previous placebo-controlled HFRS trial in China where IV ribavirin given early resulted in decreased occurrence of oliguria and decreased severity of renal insufficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Antiviral Research
#2,204
of 2,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,727
of 104,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antiviral Research
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.