↓ Skip to main content

Ecology and seasonal variation of parasites in wild Aequidens tetramerus, a Cichlidae from the Amazon

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Parasitologica, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Ecology and seasonal variation of parasites in wild Aequidens tetramerus, a Cichlidae from the Amazon
Published in
Acta Parasitologica, February 2014
DOI 10.2478/s11686-014-0225-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Tavares-Dias, Marcos Oliveira, Raissa Gonçalves, Luis Silva

Abstract

This study is the first investigation on seasonal dynamics of parasites component community of the Aequidens tetramerus from an Amazon River tributary, in Northern Brazil. A total of 239,2407 parasites were recovered from 92 hosts examined from February to October 2011. Such parasites included Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, Tripartiella tetramerii and Trichodina nobilis (Protozoa), Dolops longicauda (Argulidae), Gussevia alioides, Gussevia disparoides (Monogenoidea), Digenea metacercarie, Pseudoproleptus larvae, Anisakidae larvae (Nematoda), Proteocephalidea plerocercoid (Eucestoda) and Gorytocephalus spectabilis (Acanthocephala). Ciliates were the most dominant and abundant taxon, while cestodes were the least prevalent. The parasites showed seasonal variation in their infection dynamics associated with environmental changes during the Amazonian drainage season, except the infection with I. multifiliis. The parasites community in A. tetramerus was also characterized by higher diversity, species richness and uniformity during the drainage season when compared to Amazon flood season. With the exception of T. tetramerii, these parasite species are new records for A. tetramerus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 52%
Engineering 4 8%
Unspecified 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Parasitologica
#356
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,491
of 235,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Parasitologica
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.