↓ Skip to main content

Improving Current Practice in Reviews of the Built Environment and Physical Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Improving Current Practice in Reviews of the Built Environment and Physical Activity
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0273-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Gebel, Ding Ding, Charlie Foster, Adrian E. Bauman, James F. Sallis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Professor 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Sports and Recreations 15 13%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,841
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,054
of 269,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#38
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.