↓ Skip to main content

Familial non-immune hydrops fetalis and congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Familial non-immune hydrops fetalis and congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, May 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004310050862
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. R. Njølstad, H. Reigstad, J. Westby, A. Espeland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,771
of 4,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,692
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.