↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of observational pain management protocol to improve pain management for long-term institutionalized older care residents with dementia: study protocol for a cluster-randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of observational pain management protocol to improve pain management for long-term institutionalized older care residents with dementia: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justina Yat Wa Liu, Claudia Lai

Abstract

Systematic use of observational pain tools has been advocated as a means to improve pain management for care home residents with dementia. Pain experts suggest that any observational tool should be used as part of a comprehensive pain management protocol, which should include score interpretation and verification with appropriately suggested treatments. The Observational Pain Management Protocol (Protocol) was therefore developed. This study aims to investigate the extent to which the implementation of this Protocol can improve pain management in care home residents with dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Psychology 14 11%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 38 29%