↓ Skip to main content

Preclinical mouse solid tumour models: status quo, challenges and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
136 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preclinical mouse solid tumour models: status quo, challenges and perspectives
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrc.2017.92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 553 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 20%
Researcher 97 18%
Student > Master 34 6%
Student > Bachelor 33 6%
Other 28 5%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 166 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 146 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 4%
Other 51 9%
Unknown 186 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#702,511
of 34,397,553 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#187
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,993
of 491,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,397,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.