↓ Skip to main content

Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Vitamins D + A in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
Title
Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Vitamins D + A in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13311-017-0581-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Riccio, Rocco Rossano

Abstract

Central to the understanding of the relationships between diet, gut microbiota, and vitamins D and A in multiple sclerosis is low-grade inflammation, which is involved in all chronic inflammatory diseases and is influenced by each of the above effectors. We show that food components have either proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects and influence both the human metabolism (the "metabolome") and the composition of gut microbiota. Hypercaloric, high-animal-fat Western diets favor anabolism and change gut microbiota composition towards dysbiosis. Subsequent intestinal inflammation leads to leakage of the gut barrier, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and neuroinflammation. Conversely, a vegetarian diet, rich in fiber, is coherent with gut eubiosis and a healthy condition. Vitamin D levels, mainly insufficient in a persistent low-grade inflammatory status, can be restored to optimal values only by administration of high amounts of cholecalciferol. At its optimal values (>30 ng/ml), vitamin D requires vitamin A for the binding to the vitamin D receptor and exert its anti-inflammatory action. Both vitamins must be supplied to the subjects lacking vitamin D. We conclude that nutrients, including the nondigestible dietary fibers, have a leading role in tackling the low-grade inflammation associated with chronic inflammatory diseases. Their action is mediated by gut microbiota and any microbial change induced by diet modifies host-microbe interactions in a consequent way, to improve the disease or worsen it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 373 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 122 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 5%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 147 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,061,453
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#294
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,534
of 455,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.