↓ Skip to main content

Birds Mediate a Fungus-Mite Mutualism

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Birds Mediate a Fungus-Mite Mutualism
Published in
Microbial Ecology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-1093-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Theron-De Bruin, Léanne L. Dreyer, Eddie A. Ueckermann, Michael J. Wingfield, Francois Roets

Abstract

Mutualisms between ophiostomatoid fungi and arthropods have been well documented. These fungi commonly aid arthropod nutrition and, in turn, are transported to new niches by these arthropods. The inflorescences of Protea trees provide a niche for a unique assemblage of ophiostomatoid fungi. Here, mites feed on Sporothrix fungi and vector the spores to new niches. Protea-pollinating beetles transport the spore-carrying mites between Protea trees. However, many Protea species are primarily pollinated by birds that potentially play a central role in the Protea-Sporothrix-mite system. To investigate the role of birds in the movement of mites and/or fungal spores, mites were collected from Protea inflorescences and cape sugarbirds, screened for Sporothrix fungal spores and tested for their ability to feed and reproduce on the fungal associates. Two mite species where abundant in both Protea inflorescences and on cape sugarbirds and regularly carried Sporothrix fungal spores. One of these mite species readily fed and reproduced on its transported fungal partner. For dispersal, this mite (a Glycyphagus sp.) attached to a larger mite species (Proctolaelaps vandenbergi) which, in turn, were carried by the birds to new inflorescences. The results of this study provide compelling evidence for a new mite-fungus mutualism, new mite-mite commensalisms and the first evidence of birds transporting mites with Sporothrix fungal spores to colonise new Protea trees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 33%
Environmental Science 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,567,194
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#157
of 2,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,448
of 327,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.