↓ Skip to main content

Department of Error

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Department of Error
Published in
The Lancet, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32650-8
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 19 17%
Professor 17 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#39,451
of 42,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,293
of 335,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#391
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.