↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Systems Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Silico Systems Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Defining Systems Biology: A Brief Overview of the Term and Field
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Approaches to Modeling Gene Regulatory Networks: A Gentle Introduction
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Integration of Genomic Information with Biological Networks Using Cytoscape
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Visualization and Analysis of Biological Networks
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Modeling Signaling Networks with Different Formalisms: A Preview
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 From a Biological Hypothesis to the Construction of a Mathematical Model
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Practical Use of BiNoM: A Biological Network Manager Software
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using Chemical Kinetics to Model Biochemical Pathways
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Simulation of Stochastic Kinetic Models
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 BioModels Database: A Repository of Mathematical Models of Biological Processes
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Supporting SBML as a Model Exchange Format in Software Applications
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Controlled Annotations for Systems Biology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Bayesian Approaches for Mechanistic Ion Channel Modeling
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Building models using Reactome pathways as templates.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Uniform Curation Protocol of Metazoan Signaling Pathways to Predict Novel Signaling Components
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Bioinformatics Workflows and Web Services in Systems Biology Made Easy for Experimentalists
Attention for Chapter 10: BioModels Database: A Repository of Mathematical Models of Biological Processes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
BioModels Database: A Repository of Mathematical Models of Biological Processes
Chapter number 10
Book title
In Silico Systems Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-450-0_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-449-4, 978-1-62703-450-0
Authors

Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Camille Laibe, Nicolas Le Novère, Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi, Laibe, Camille, Novère, Nicolas Le

Abstract

BioModels Database is a public online resource that allows storing and sharing of published, peer-reviewed quantitative, dynamic models of biological processes. The model components and behaviour are thoroughly checked to correspond the original publication and manually curated to ensure reliability. Furthermore, the model elements are annotated with terms from controlled vocabularies as well as linked to relevant external data resources. This greatly helps in model interpretation and reuse. Models are stored in SBML format, accepted in SBML and CellML formats, and are available for download in various other common formats such as BioPAX, Octave, SciLab, VCML, XPP and PDF, in addition to SBML. The reaction network diagram of the models is also available in several formats. BioModels Database features a search engine, which provides simple and more advanced searches. Features such as online simulation and creation of smaller models (submodels) from the selected model elements of a larger one are provided. BioModels Database can be accessed both via a web interface and programmatically via web services. New models are available in BioModels Database at regular releases, about every 4 months.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 35%
Computer Science 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#5,805,337
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,637
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,133
of 282,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#65
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.