↓ Skip to main content

Paratesticular pilomatricoma: a new location

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Paratesticular pilomatricoma: a new location
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, November 2001
DOI 10.1007/s003830100016
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Diomedi Camassei, P. Francalanci, R. Boldrini, A. Spagnoli, M. C. Lucchetti, F. Ferro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,805,337
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#112
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,506
of 44,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them