| Title |
Consensus statement with recommendations on active surveillance inclusion criteria and definition of progression in men with localized prostate cancer: the critical role of the pathologist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virchows Archiv, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00428-014-1668-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rodolfo Montironi, Elizabeth H. Hammond, Daniel W. Lin, John L. Gore, John R. Srigley, Hema Samaratunga, Lars Egevad, Mark A. Rubin, John Nacey, Laurence Klotz, Howard Sandler, Anthony L. Zietman, Stuart Holden, Peter A. Humphrey, Andrew J. Evans, Brett Delahunt, Jesse K. McKenney, Daniel Berney, Thomas M. Wheeler, Arul Chinnaiyan, Lawrence True, Beatrice Knudsen, Jonathan I. Epstein, Mahul B. Amin |
| Abstract |
Active surveillance (AS) is an important management option for men with low-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. The clinical parameters for patient selection and definition of progression for AS protocols are evolving as data from several large cohorts matures. Vital to this process is the critical role pathologic parameters play in identifying appropriate candidates for AS. These findings need to be reproducible and consistently reported by surgical pathologists. This report highlights the importance of accurate pathology reporting as a critical component of these protocols. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,381,794
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#1,530
of 1,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,634
of 255,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.