↓ Skip to main content

Prognosis of surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome in children

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Prognosis of surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome in children
Published in
Child's Nervous System, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00381-017-3630-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirill Sysoev, Arsen Tadevosyan, Konstantin Samochernykh, William Khachatryan

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the factors relevant to the prognosis of the outcome of the surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome (TCS). The results of surgical treatment performed on 58 children with TCS were analyzed, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years. The data of preoperative clinical and instrumental examinations, as well as those of intraoperative electrophysiological diagnostics and morphometry, were compared with the dynamics of the TCS clinical presentation. The recovery rate was significantly higher in children with filum terminale abnormality (p = 0.014), as well as grade I tethering (p = 0.0037), and when the spinal cord tracts at the level of intervention were intact (p = 0.018). Complete untethering (p = 0.04) and a low threshold value of amperage in direct stimulation (< 1 mA) (p = 0.016) were identified as factors for a favorable outcome. Worsening of neurological symptoms was more frequent in children operated over the age of 10 (p = 0.03), when the TCS was manifested exclusively through the pelvic dysfunction (p = 0.00004), if the F-wave block is less than 30% (p = 0.0045) and the stimulation threshold during root mapping ranged from 1 to 5 mA (p = 0.01). The operation is recommended when structural changes are minimal. In case of severe structural changes, if the spinal cord tracts are intact, the indications for operation are determined by the risk of irreversible structural changes due to the natural course of the disease, although the risks are substantially higher.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,448
of 2,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,949
of 327,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#48
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.