↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Retention on Superhydrophobic Titanium Surfaces Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser Ablation

Overview of attention for article published in Langmuir, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
357 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial Retention on Superhydrophobic Titanium Surfaces Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser Ablation
Published in
Langmuir, February 2011
DOI 10.1021/la104607g
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Fadeeva, Vi Khanh Truong, Meike Stiesch, Boris N. Chichkov, Russell J. Crawford, James Wang, Elena P. Ivanova

Abstract

Two-tier micro- and nanoscale quasi-periodic self-organized structures, mimicking the surface of a lotus Nelumbo nucifera leaf, were fabricated on titanium surfaces using femtosecond laser ablation. The first tier consisted of large grainlike convex features between 10 and 20 μm in size. The second tier existed on the surface of these grains, where 200 nm (or less) wide irregular undulations were present. The introduction of the biomimetic surface patterns significantly transformed the surface wettabilty of the titanium surface. The original surface possessed a water contact angle of θ(W) 73 ± 3°, whereas the laser-treated titanium surface became superhydrophobic, with a water contact angle of θ(W) 166 ± 4°. Investigations of the interaction of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa with these superhydrophobic surfaces at the surface-liquid interface revealed a highly selective retention pattern for two pathogenic bacteria. While S. aureus cells were able to successfully colonize the superhydrophobic titanium surfaces, no P. aeruginosa cells were able to attach to the surface (i.e., any attached bacterial cells were below the estimated lower detection limit).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 326 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 27%
Researcher 51 15%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 54 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 87 26%
Materials Science 58 17%
Chemistry 23 7%
Physics and Astronomy 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 84 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,308,698
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Langmuir
#10,551
of 13,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,667
of 182,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langmuir
#114
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,937 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.