You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treating Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Psychiatry, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1600 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard A. Bryant, Lucy Kenny, Amy Joscelyne, Natasha Rawson, Fiona Maccallum, Catherine Cahill, Sally Hopwood, Idan Aderka, Angela Nickerson |
| Abstract |
Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is a potentially disabling condition that affects approximately 10% of bereaved people. Grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in treating PGD. Although treatments for PGD have focused on exposure therapy, much debate remains about whether exposure therapy is optimal for PGD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 112 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#260,686
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#622
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,848
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.