↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of the performance of an applied general equilibrium model of the Spanish economy

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Theory, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
An evaluation of the performance of an applied general equilibrium model of the Spanish economy
Published in
Economic Theory, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01213943
Authors

Timothy J. Kehoe, Clemente Polo, Ferran Sancho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 59%
Engineering 3 11%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#72
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,445
of 76,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.