↓ Skip to main content

図書館における廃棄 : 基本的な考え方と実際 (ザ・廃棄)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,232)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
図書館における廃棄 : 基本的な考え方と実際 (ザ・廃棄)
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, February 1995
DOI 10.18919/jkg.45.2_80
Authors

酒井 昌夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,706,514
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#16
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,172
of 78,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them