You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiethnic Meta-Analysis Identifies RAI1 as a Possible Obstructive Sleep Apnea–related Quantitative Trait Locus in Men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0237oc |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Han Chen, Brian E Cade, Kevin J Gleason, Andrew C Bjonnes, Adrienne M Stilp, Tamar Sofer, Matthew P Conomos, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Raanan Arens, Ali Azarbarzin, Graeme I Bell, Jennifer E Below, Sung Chun, Daniel S Evans, Ralf Ewert, Alexis C Frazier-Wood, Sina A Gharib, José Haba-Rubio, Erika W Hagen, Raphael Heinzer, David R Hillman, W Craig Johnson, Zoltan Kutalik, Jacqueline M Lane, Emma K Larkin, Seung Ku Lee, Jingjing Liang, Jose S Loredo, Sutapa Mukherjee, Lyle J Palmer, George J Papanicolaou, Thomas Penzel, Paul E Peppard, Wendy S Post, Alberto R Ramos, Ken Rice, Jerome I Rotter, Scott A Sands, Neomi A Shah, Chol Shin, Katie L Stone, Beate Stubbe, Jae Hoon Sul, Mehdi Tafti, Kent D Taylor, Alexander Teumer, Timothy A Thornton, Gregory J Tranah, Chaolong Wang, Heming Wang, Simon C Warby, D Andrew Wellman, Phyllis C Zee, Craig L Hanis, Cathy C Laurie, Daniel J Gottlieb, Sanjay R Patel, Xiaofeng Zhu, Shamil R Sunyaev, Richa Saxena, Xihong Lin, Susan Redline |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,115,794
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
#187
of 3,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,487
of 343,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.