↓ Skip to main content

Engineering a synthetic pathway for maleate in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
15 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering a synthetic pathway for maleate in Escherichia coli
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01233-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuhei Noda, Tomokazu Shirai, Yutaro Mori, Sachiko Oyama, Akihiko Kondo

Abstract

Maleate is one of the most important dicarboxylic acids and is used to produce various polymer compounds and pharmaceuticals. Herein, microbial production of maleate is successfully achieved, to our knowledge for the first time, using genetically modified Escherichia coli. A synthetic pathway of maleate is constructed in E. coli by combining the polyketide biosynthesis pathway and benzene ring cleavage pathway. The metabolic engineering approach used to fine-tune the synthetic pathway drastically improves maleate production and demonstrates that one of the rate limiting steps exists in the conversion of chorismate to gentisate. In a batch culture of the optimised transformant, grown in a 1-L jar fermentor, the amount of produced maleate reaches 7.1 g L(-1), and the yield is 0.221 mol mol(-1). Our results suggest that the construction of synthetic pathways by combining a secondary metabolite pathway and the benzene ring cleavage pathway is a powerful tool for producing various valuable chemicals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 30%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Chemical Engineering 4 6%
Chemistry 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#807,386
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#13,497
of 48,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,319
of 329,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#448
of 1,454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.