↓ Skip to main content

BCR-ABL and JAK2V617F Mutation Co-existence, Rare or Just Unexplored

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
BCR-ABL and JAK2V617F Mutation Co-existence, Rare or Just Unexplored
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12288-017-0781-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. S. Darling, Rajiv Kumar, Rajan Kapoor, Jasjit Singh, Tarun Verma

Abstract

Current hematology practice distinguishes chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and other major chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms as different entities classically characterized by positivity of BCR-ABL fusion gene and JAK2V617F mutations. These are different in clinical presentation, molecular genetics, therapy and response to present treatments. Nevertheless, there have been occasional case reports of detection of both mutations in the same patient. Although some of these had been incidentally detected, most have manifested clinically while being treated for one disease. Here, we present two cases of co-existence of BCR-ABL and JAK2V617F positivity. The first one was initially managed as CML. On obtaining adequate molecular and hematological response, thrombocytosis persisted. Hence she was tested for JAK2V617F mutation. In the second case, when we noticed upfront very high platelet counts along with a clinical picture of CML, we tested her for both and was found to be positive for both. Till to date, no such clinical case has been reported from India. The current status and approach to BCR ABL and JAK2 coexistent mutations has been reviewed and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,495,804
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#255
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,425
of 426,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.